|PSA - Train wreck in progress
||[Nov. 1st, 2006|10:31 pm]
I don't really think of myself as a political person. Sure, I have my beliefs, but I'm not about to go out try to convince others that mine are right and you should totally vote the way I tell you, and boy, by the way, have this tasty lollipop with it's green Franklin wrapper.|
But sometimes, you just need to make people aware, and let them come to their own decisions.
This past week, it seems I've been bombarded, much like mallet strikes to an unprotected head, by various people saying that electronic voting machines are going to be the death of democracy.
For example, Jon "Hannibal" Strokes, writer for arstechnica since the beginning of time, has an extraordinarily long newspost about the "gathering storm" of e-voting problems. Likewise, Bruce Schneier blogs repeatedly about flaws in voting software.
So, go vote something wonky this November so you can claim you were disenfranchised. I could be a lot more crazy sounding, but I'll just say this computer science student rejects utterly the concept of computer aided voting being better than what we had in the 50's.
Ah, yes. Hopefully your scantron system isn't like Diebold's AccuVote Optical Scan OV-OS, which will gladly accept post-it notes
as valid ballots, and count them accordingly. You see, no serial numbers on the ballots to compare with the serial number series issued to that county, or to prevent running the same vote card through a billion times. you know, things like that.
Hopefully the county elections people aren't feeding post-its through it :)
2006-11-02 10:42 pm (UTC)
I tried digging around on the Secretary of State's website for Oregon, and I was able to find their procedures doc... but nothing saying what the actual machines are that do the scanning...
2006-11-03 05:27 pm (UTC)
IVS, methinks, this year. ... some sort of suit in progress with the winner of the contract refusing to abide by the contract terms.